My
previous posts touch on how ICT, in the form of EHR, CPOE and CDS, can benefit
hospitals. Of course, the implementation cost for these technologies varies
depending on many factors such as hospital size and technology scope. But in general, they are
not cheap. As illustrations, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center spent
about $80 million to implement EHR, University of California - San Francisco Medical
Center spent about $150 million, and Duke University Health System spent about $700
million (Yes, you read it correctly, it’s $700 million). As far as federal government
incentives go, the Medicare and Medicaid only provide them to the hospitals who are
meaningfully using the EHR system. The definition of “meaningful use” is
explained in more detail here. But basically, a hospital needs to achieve
several objectives before it can claim the reimbursement. This includes making
sure that all stakeholders are devoted to use the technologies.
![]() |
Duke University Health System It's gonna be $700 million, please. Debit or Credit? |
Therefore,
it is very important for hospitals to get the full benefit from EHR and other
systems by performing the “meaningful use” of the technology. In this post, I
will share some best practices how to achieve that.
1.
Full engagement of all stakeholders is the key
EHR and other
technologies implementation are not IT department projects. IT department can
install the technology quickly and easily. The projects, however, are more
complicated than just installing software. These technologies would change the entire hospitals
approach and operations. It is wrong to assume that each stakeholder will
adjust his/her habits accordingly once a technology is put in. Rather, hospitals
would need to secure
the opinions and recommendations of the staff. This will eventually lead to
their cooperation and commitment in the future. Therefore, the implementation team should include representatives from different
hospital areas identifying requirements and implementation elements.
![]() |
Key: All Stakeholders Involvement |
2.
Physicians should take the ownership
Implementing EHR and other technologies for the
first time will temporarily put burden on the physicians, who might be
overworked and overloaded already. As instance, in the beginning it might take
a longer time for a physician to input an instruction using CPOE compared to
write it on the paper. This will bring frustration. Therefore, it is very important
to let the physicians take the ownership of the implementation. That way,
hospitals will get the implementation process moving forward.
3.
Educate and Train All Stakeholders including Employees,
Physicians, and Staff
Education and training will help smoothening the
transition to a new system. Hospitals would need to do this via workshops
and seminars, internal marketing efforts, and education campaigns. It is also
important to share the implementation milestone, so the stakeholders are aware of the progress. Hospitals also need to recognize some
preferences and needs of the stakeholders. For instance, during EHR
implementation process, hospitals should not try to force all physicians to do exactly the same
thing. Hospitals need to provide several ways to accomplish the same task and
offer physicians some flexibility to choose what will fit their practice style
the best. This will add the training complexity, but it will guarantee a more successful
implementation.
4.
Beside Implementation Team, Optimization Team is also Needed
Optimization team’s main task is to identify and
implement improvement opportunities. This especially important during the
mid-process of implementation. The other tasks include, but not limited to, identifying the
best practices learned by the hospital staffs and retraining the stakeholders
the updates based on trials and earlier outcomes.
5.
Duplication and Plan B are necessary
Redundant data entry must be minimized. However, the hospital administrators need to have a backup system or at least, a
plan of action if the system is suddenly down or not functioning as it’s supposed
to be.
The cost to build a redundancy
and backup system is worth the benefit.
No comments:
Post a Comment